|
|||||||||||
|
Suggestion for better frequency usage in West /
South Yorkshire,
1 Introduction & Foreword The idea revolves around creating a new frequency for West / South Yorkshire. In order to create a new frequency a gap must be first sought and therefore other services currently available juggled to make better use of the spectrum. This document uses the frequency listing in the appendix as a platform. Is can be seen the spectrum in this part of the country is very packed. This frequency list encompasses both the BBC and Independent broadcasters technical parameters and pixel plots have been carried out by using a program named Radio Mobile.
The area of interest is based in Northern England and is highly populated, with the major towns of Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and Huddersfield in cross proximity to the area of interest. It is common for cities to have a large number of independent radio stations, which makes space quite sparse. Hence by producing a spare frequency for this region may invoke interest from interested parties in any of these cities. It would also mean that bidding might come from a large proportion of interested parties, which makes this frequency of great financial benefit. |
|||||||||||
Figure 1- Yorkshire and the North of England. [1] © Microsoft World Atlas. 2 Issues to Note What should be noted is the presence of two very powerful transmitters in the region one located at Emley Moor and one located at Holme Moss. Emley Moor has traditionally been used for Independent radio broadcasts and Holme Moss has traditionally been used for BBC radio transmissions. What should also be noted is that due to the hilly terrain this means than some distant "local" transmission are received clearly in areas of greater elevation. This also means that any frequency used here could also be picked up in the distant local area. Holme Moss transmits no less than 3 different BBC local services from but each transmits in a different direction to reach its target audience. These factors have to be taken into
account when swapping and adjusting frequencies. Figure
2-
Holme Moss coverage for BBC Leeds (pale orange colour) [2]
Map © BBC
Figure 3- Holme Moss coverage for BBC Sheffield (pale orange colour) [2] Map © BBC. |
|||||||||||
|
Figure 4-
Holme Moss coverage for BBC GMR (pale orange colour) [2] Map
© BBC. These figures are assumed to be relatively accurate as these were plotted by the BBC to show the level of coverage. As these plots are quite old, its possible that the coverage is understated. The new service could either use Holme Moss or Emley Moor using a power in the region of 5kW; the service could aim for the reception produced by amalgamating the BBC Leeds and BBC Sheffield coverage areas (in the case of a Holme Moss service). Using Radio Mobile and a power of 5kW the following plots are produced for coverage at Holme Moss and Emley Moor (the two most likely transmitters for a new service). ![]() Figure 5
5kW from Holme Moss [3] ![]() Figure 6
5kW of Power from Emley Moor. [3] Since there are no complaints currently one can only assume that the current system works if is somewhat wasteful. As the region is very hilly some frequencies are re-used on either side of the Yorkshire moors since the moors themselves act to reflect the transmissions away from the other area using the same frequency. However, when taking into account a new
service, the service available in the area must be taken into account
but also number of non-Yorkshire services do spill over into Yorkshire.
Figure 7- Sutton Coldfield coverage for BBC West Midlands at 12kW [2] Map © BBC. |
|||||||||||
|
However it can be deduced from the Appendix that a number of transmitters share frequencies and others have a channel separation of less than 300kHz as stated above this must work in some cases. There are a number of small holes on the band, but none of these are really large enough to fit a service in directly. Hence a degree of frequency shuffling and reordering is necessary to create a space wide enough to fit in the extra service. The location of the gaps are :-
Sutton Coldfield uses the same power for Heart (100.7) this means that these services could be safely ignored in the frequency plan. Although the Pennines do have a lot of elevation, a local service in a valley should be immune from interference. A new service for Huddersfield (for example) would be immune to interference from Sutton Coldfield due to the Peak National Park shielding transmissions. Looking at the nationals from Sutton Coldfield
Figure 8-
Sutton Coldfield coverage for BBC Nationals at 240kW [2]Map
© BBC. Again the data is slightly old
but
never the less gives a good idea. It may understate due to the nature
of
modern receivers being far more sensitive. Note on the map the furthest
that this signal theoretically reaches is Chesterfield. This is just a
few miles short of Sheffield and really could not be discounted for
services in South Yorkshire. For a new service in the Huddersfield area
with the natural blocking due to the Peak District National Park the
weaker signal could not over come this well and hence may not be
received in the Huddersfield Area. ![]() Figure 9
Shows RadioMobile's [3] view of the same data (the coverage of the
BBC
nationals from Sutton Coldfield) The RED area being the 54 dB uV/m
limit
( The yellow area is the area where reception and therefore
interference
may be possible) - these two plots are relatively close. Hence it
can be proved that for the transmitters where coverage maps are not
available or where there is a charge for the use of maps - that
RadioMobile can be used as a suitable substitute in its place.
|
|||||||||||
|
3. Solutions ![]() Figure 10
the
separation must be 400kHz. The Huddersfield signal also travels a long
way for very little power (200W). Hebden Bridge - Yellow, Huddersfield
Purple. [3] The frequency could be used for an ILR for Huddersfield (for example) which could go here (400kHz separation) even though the Hebden Bridge mast is close, or alternatively any service as this would not suffer interference from Sutton Coldfield. So long as the mast used is not in the yellow area of figure 7 (as the channel separation is only 300kHz and is not enough!). The transmitter at Huddersfield is at
Ainley Top and is an ILR transmitter so, there would be no great
problem
with broadcasts from here using 88 also noting the presence of Hebden
Bridge only 25W but still important.
Figure
11
The bottom of the VHF band using data from [4] & [5]
The intermediate Frequency of this is 98.7 (100kHz from Bilsdale BBC Radio 1 but Bilsdale is too far away from the new service for it to cause any difficulties) and 109.4 (out of band). On the face of it this is the only obvious gap to fit in a service, however by taking into account the power and locations of some of the transmitters in this area it may be possible to shoe horn in another service. It may also be potent to reduce the channel separation between the BBC services in order to make space further up the band. It may well be necessary to adjust the frequencies slightly of some of the current services as there are gaps in the band but not largest for a service. However one advantage for the frequency planner, the Peak District National Park may well shield broadcasts from one side of Yorkshire to the other and Lancashire. It is from these details that some frequency re-arranging can be carried out in order to add in an extra service. 88MHz appears to be the best solution and this could even work for a service (regional) from Holme Moss or Emley Moor producing better coverage for the new service but without causing a detrimental effect on current services. Note Ofcom rules also apply to 87.6 to 88.0 where these frequencies are used for Short Term (time wise) or small distance licences known as Restricted Service Licences (RSLs). 3.2 Solution #2 Using 99.8 (2BR
becomes 100.1) ![]() Figure
12 Shows Pendle Forest Yellow and Idle Blue. However, Burnley (2BRs
target area) is covered [3] The coverage only overlaps in a few areas (marked green), for the national Classic fm station this may not be seen as a problem. Allowing for 2BR to be moved to 100.1 is within 200kHz of Classic FM to from Idle on 100.3 (this giving 10.8 clearance to BBC R2 on 89.3 which is the service from Holme Moss) could case some adjacent channel interference problems especially for listeners using receivers with poor selectivity. Pendle Forest, however, carries BBC R2 indicating that the reception of this signal in the Burnley area is poor hence the interference may be minimal in Burnley but problematical towards the Northern reaches of the 2BR area. It must also be considered that with 2BR
on 100.1 there could be interference to Smooth on 100.4 and vice versa
due to the resulting 300kHz relationship . The service which goes into
the gap left by 2BR can only be a local based service from a
transmitter
which carries the BBC nationals (indicating that the signal from Holme
Moss is poor in this area where there 10.7 clearance to BBC
R2).
Hence this option is limited in its scope. Figure
13
99.1 to 100.5 on the VHF band using data from [4] & [5]
|
|||||||||||
3.3 Solution #3 Using 99.8 / 99.9
(2BR becomes 102.2) ![]() Figure 14 the Burnley signal v Belmont signal. [3]
Adding in Wigans Wish FM, shows some problems, ![]() Figure 15 Belmont (Yellow) v Burnley (Purple) v Wigan (blue). [3] If this is a problem for Wish (even though it is outside of their coverage area), then a new frequency can be sought (this is quite easy due to Wishs small coverage area) there is no interaction with Bradford.
![]() Figure 16 Looking at 101.7 to 102.4 on the VHF band using data from [4] & [5] and taking into account the moving of 2BR.
2BR would have an Intermediate
Frequency of 91.5 since this lands right on the main Holme Moss
transmitter of Radio 3, so it could be 102.1- 102.3 would not
work as this is too close to the Halifax transmissions of Pulse at 102.5.The
other IF is at 112.9. Galaxy is the same as previously so if
any complaints regarding IF are not due to changes made by this
document! Figure
17
Burnley v Belmont (100kHz-channel separation) shows three small
areas of interference circled black.
|
|||||||||||
3.4 Solution #4 94.6 Making use of
Holme Moss / Emley Moor transmitter By making use of the space at the top of the band due to the fact that the Sutton Coldfield transmission do not reach the target area and by some juggling of the current frequencies in particular the nationals this will allow for a new frequency to appear. This can be used for regional broadcasting hence this licence is worth a great deal more and is of much more use to all parties concerned. Referring to the Introduction, 5kW from Holme Moss and Emley Moor will travel a great distance. Either of these transmitters has a great advantage with its coverage of Manchester, Leeds, and Sheffield and perhaps on a good day even Liverpool! Whilst this is good for the broadcaster this is a nightmare for the frequency planner who has to check every frequency for interference in any area where this signal lands (on the map). But also the Intermediate Frequency must also be checked.![]() Figure
18
BBC R2 is now at 88.2 from Pendle Forest. Firstly the gap at
the
bottom of the band is used moving BBC 2/3/4 at Pendle Forest to move
from 90.2/92.6/94.6 to 88.2/90.2/92.6.
![]() Figure
19
Pendle Forest (Yellow) v Sutton Coldfield (Green) only two points
of
interference (green) circled black for clarity. [3]
By making this change creates a gap at 94.6MHz. This frequency is shared with BBC Stoke (from Alsagers Bank). ![]() Figure
20
Shows BBC Stoke at 6.1kW (assuming Omni-directional), as the BBC do
not state the directionality of their transmitters this is a slight
guess. The Independent service from this mast is highly directional. [3]
It is therefore unlikely that transmission would travel this far North (and if so could be limited a little), clearly transmissions South from Holme Moss would also be limited be the use of directional transmitters. (Coverage patterns such as that of figure 2 or figure 3 would probably be the most potent). It is also 100kHz to Chesterfield. Referring to page 5, this means that this is moved to either 88 or 88.1 (where there is a gap), or 99.9 (which as proved before is also a gap). There is a relay for each of the national stations at Chesterfield indicating coverage of the Holme Moss transmitter is poor. Chesterfield does not have a large coverage area so it is possible for it to co-exist with another station the other side of the Pennines. Giving Chesterfield 88.0MHz, Pendle Forest
88.2MHz and with Sutton Coldfield unchanged on 88.3MHz, produces the
following plot. ![]() Figure 21 Shows areas of red (interference) where they are least wanted - in Chesterfield! [3] This is allowing 300kHz from Sutton Coldfield to Chesterfield. Chesterfield 400W Yellow, Pendle Forest 1kW Blue, Sutton Coldfield Purple, 250kW. However 300kHz between Chesterfield and Sutton Coldfield is plenty.
This is not necessarily, the best solution, but the Pendle Forest, Chesterfield issue shows there is little or no interference between these too, Woolmoor co-exists with Sheffield so clearly the 99.9 option is best (allowing 400kHz to Idle (Bradford)). These are well screened by hills this is OK!! Figure 22 Chesterfield - Purple, Idle Yellow, Pendle Forest Blue. [3]
With 400kHz clearance this would work in reality a 100kHz clearance between Idle and Chesterfield would be enough these are well screened by hills. ![]() Figure 23
The new home for BBC Sheffield at Chesterfield is 99.9. [4] & [5]
![]() Figure 24 BBC Lincolnshire 94.9, 6kW, Yellow. BBC Stoke 94.6 Alsagers Bank Blue. The new service on 94.6MHz must transmit North and East from Holme Moss or Winter Hill. Its coverage area could possibly include Bradford or Hebden Bridge or Huddersfield. [3] The coverage areas would not overlap
with the new 5kW service if they do there must be a 7dB difference
between services.
Figure 25 shows the area where the new service would go. [4] & [5] |
|||||||||||
4. Conclusion Unfortunately due to the hilly terrain this makes frequency planning quite difficult. The 250kW Holme Moss transmitter can be stumbling block with I.F. problems until it is realised that in-fill transmitters are only used where the coverage of the main transmitter is poor. Hence in these areas a frequency which has an IF that is the same or close to the value of the main Holme Moss transmitter can be used.
5. Getting these changes made a
reality 6. Appendix 7. References & Bibliography
|
|||||||||||
| Home | Contact | Site Map | Reciprocal Links and Credits | Thank You | |||||||||||